﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Society of Diabetic Nephropathy Prevention</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Preventive Epidemiology</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2476-3934</Issn>
      <Volume>3</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <DAY>01</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>The diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of scaphoid bone fractures</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>e17</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>e17</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mojtaba</FirstName>
        <LastName>Chardoli</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-2716</Identifier>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Bahramnejad</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-3319</Identifier>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Pedram</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kakvan</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">
      </ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <Day>07</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <Day>13</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Introduction: An assessment of small bones damages is important regarding how to choose the best invasive or non-invasive treatment approaches. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of ultrasonography for diagnosis of scaphoid bone fracture in comparison with radiology and CT scan. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 224 patients with trauma to wrist and suspected to scaphoid bone fracture. Patients were evaluated with ultrasonography using a linear superficial probe on admission. Then, another radiologist who was unaware of ultrasound results, evaluated the evidence of bone fracture by radiography and CT scanning. Results: Comparing the results of ultrasonography with CT scan as the gold standard, the sensitivity of ultrasonography was 85.2%, the specificity was 87.5%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 81.5%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 90.2%, and the diagnostic accuracy was equal to 86.6%. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography was slightly higher in men than in women, and in older patients than in younger subjects, and also in patients referring with a delay of more than three hours compared to earlier referring. Conclusion: Ultrasonography can be an accurate tool as compared to other diagnostic modalities for detection of scaphoid bone fractures particularly in men, in the elderlies, and in those with delayed referring</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Ultrasonography</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Scaphoid</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Bone Fractures</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>